Belgrade Philosophical Annual 29:115-141 (2016)
AbstractDeterminism is usually understood as a commonly clear and obvious thesis. In the most of the actual literature a character of determinism is rarely enough explicitly underlined and we believe that it is the reason why common uses of the term often leads to inconsistencies and present a source of misunderstandings of different sorts. Here we will try to show that that there are many forms of determinism; that the concept of determinism has a composite character; and that conceptions of determinism can be mutually discriminated and organized according to particular elements they are consisting of by applying the procedure of classification.
Similar books and articles
Toward a Demarcation of Forms of Determinism.Vladimir Marko - 2017 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 24 (1):54-84.
What Next after Determinism in the Ontology of Technology? Distributing Responsibility in the Biofuel Debate.Philip Boucher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):525-538.
On finding a home for agency.Richard N. Williams - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):83-86.
Technology and Environmental Determinisms.James R. Fleming - 1997 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 17 (2-3):50-51.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism.Peter Van Inwagen - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (3):185 - 199.
Ethics in psychiatry--the patient's freedom and bondage.E. K. Ledermann - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (4):191-194.
What Is Determinism? Why We Should Ditch the Entailment Definition.Helen Steward - 2021 - In Marco Hausmann & Jörg Noller (eds.), Free Will: Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Springer Verlag. pp. 17-43.
Why there are no good arguments for any interesting version of determinism.Mark Balaguer - 2009 - Synthese 168 (1):1 - 21.
Le déterminisme du hasard: Quelques exemples tirés de la théorie des graphes et des paysages.Dominique Lambert - 2005 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 61 (3):515-525.
A Pragmatic and Empirical Approach to Free Will.Andrea Lavazza - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):247-258.
How free are you? The determinism problem.Ted Honderich - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press. pp. 249.
How to think about the free will/determinism problem.Kadri Vihvelin - 2011 - In Michael O'Rourke, Joseph Keim Campbell & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Carving Nature at its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. MIT Press. pp. 314--340.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829.
Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement.Nancy Cartwright - 1989 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.