Lotman’s scientific investigatory boldness

Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):81-103 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main focus of this article is the analysis of the concept of semiosphere as it has emerged from the conception of culture as information — instead of describing the transmission of messages from A to B, it is based on the general process of meaning generation. Following Lotman’s criticism on the paradoxes in communication and its theoretical domain, the article confronts the paradoxical concepts on: (1) the concept of message transmission from the addresser toaddressee; (2) the notion of isolated processing systems; (3) the idea that culture speaks a unique language. From the standpoint of the semiosphere, the new object for studying such controversies could be found in the concept of text. When text is taken at the centre of the analysis of culture, nothing appears in an isolated fashion. Lotman’s thinking does not fear the new hypothesis in proposing the conceptual domain of semiosphere to the scientific study of culture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semiosphere.Kaie Kotov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):41-54.
On the semiosphere.Juri Lotman & Wilma Clark - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):205-226.
Challenging identity.Daniele Monticelli - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):319-338.
Atomistic versus holistic semiotics.Mihhail Lotman - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):513-526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
20 (#761,812)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references