Atomistic versus holistic semiotics

Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):513-526 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is devoted on the foundations of semiotics. It examines the specific features of Peircean and Saussurean traditions and demonstrates that the basis of all the differences is the different conception of the nature of sign: Peirce proceeds from the substitutive concept, Saussure from the bilateral one. The substitutive construction is atomistic by its nature: it is based on a (single) sign which replaces a (single) object, while bilateral is holistic: it is based on the sign system which is divided into (single) signs. The differences of semiosis in atomistic and holistic approach will be pointed out.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the semiosphere.Juri Lotman & Wilma Clark - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):205-226.
Semiosphere.Kaie Kotov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):41-54.
On the zoosemiotics of health and disease.Aleksei Turovski - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):213-218.
Umwelt ethics.Morten Tønnessen - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):281-299.
Biosemiotics in a Gallery.Kalevi Kull & Ekaterina Velmezova - 2012 - Biosemiotics 5 (3):313-317.
Lotman’s scientific investigatory boldness.Irene Machado - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):81-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
49 (#316,480)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?