Atomistic versus holistic semiotics

Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):513-526 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is devoted on the foundations of semiotics. It examines the specific features of Peircean and Saussurean traditions and demonstrates that the basis of all the differences is the different conception of the nature of sign: Peirce proceeds from the substitutive concept, Saussure from the bilateral one. The substitutive construction is atomistic by its nature: it is based on a (single) sign which replaces a (single) object, while bilateral is holistic: it is based on the sign system which is divided into (single) signs. The differences of semiosis in atomistic and holistic approach will be pointed out.

Other Versions

original Lotman, Mihhail (2002) "Atomistic versus holistic semiotics". Sign Systems Studies 30(2):513-526

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,395

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Atomistic versus holistic semiotics.Mihhail Lotman - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):513-526.
Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature.Winfried Nöth - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):219-234.
Text semiotics.Dinda L. Gorlée - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:134-156.
An introduction to phytosemiotics.Kalevi Kull - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:326-350.
Projections.Irene Machado - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):463-476.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
58 (#296,651)

6 months
18 (#235,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?