Is R.S. Peters' way of mentioning women in his texts detrimental to philosophy of education? Some considerations and questions

Ethics and Education 7 (3):291-302 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. Is R.S. Peters' way of mentioning women in his texts detrimental to philosophy of education? Some considerations and questions. Ethics and Education: Vol. 7, Creating spaces, pp. 291-302. doi: 10.1080/17449642.2013.767002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-15

Downloads
94 (#182,917)

6 months
14 (#179,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Lees
University of Stirling

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Ethics and education.Richard Stanley Peters - 1966 - London,: Allen & Unwin.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 38 references / Add more references