Modal collapse in Gödel's ontological proof

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--323 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After introductory reminder of and comments on Gödel’s ontological proof, we discuss the collapse of modalities, which is provable in Gödel’s ontological system GO. We argue that Gödel’s texts confirm modal collapse as intended consequence of his ontological system. Further, we aim to show that modal collapse properly fits into Gödel’s philosophical views, especially into his ontology of separation and union of force and fact, as well as into his cosmological theory of the nonobjectivity of the lapse of time. As a result, modal collapse should not be conceived in Gödel so much as a deficit, but rather as a kind of the rise of modalities to the “perfect” being. We further show that, in accordance with Gödel’s ontology, the concepts of modality and time should be derived in terms of the “fundamental philosophical concept” of cause. To give an example of how a formalization of such causative Gödelian ontology and ontological proof might look, we propose the transformation of GO into a kind of causally re-interpreted justification logic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof.C. Anthony Anderson - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Gödel, Kant, and the Path of a Science.Srećko Kovač - 2008 - Inquiry: Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169.
Lower Bounds for Modal Logics.Pavel Hrubeš - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):941 - 958.
Arithmetic Proof and Open Sentences.Neil Thompson - 2012 - Philosophy Study 2 (1):43-50.
Some weakened Gödelian ontological systems.Srećko Kovač - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (6):565-588.
Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
The gödel paradox and Wittgenstein's reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
On gödel's ontological proof.A. P. Hazen - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):361 – 377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-25

Downloads
418 (#47,081)

6 months
233 (#10,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Srećko Kovač
Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb

References found in this work

Explicit provability and constructive semantics.Sergei N. Artemov - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-36.
The logic of justification.Sergei Artemov - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):477-513.
Justification logic.Sergei Artemov - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof.C. Anthony Anderson - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Gödel, Kant, and the Path of a Science.Srećko Kovač - 2008 - Inquiry: Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169.

View all 10 references / Add more references