Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof

Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Kurt Gödel’s version of the ontological argument was shown by J. Howard Sobel to be defective, but some plausible modifications in the argument result in a version which is immune to Sobel’s objection. A definition is suggested which permits the proof of some of Godel’s axioms.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modal collapse in Gödel's ontological proof.Srećko Kovač - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Frankfurt a. M., etc.: Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--323.
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Arithmetic Proof and Open Sentences.Neil Thompson - 2012 - Philosophy Study 2 (1):43-50.
Proof theory. Gödel and the metamathematical tradition.Jeremy Avigad - 2010 - In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Kurt Gödel: Essays for His Centennial. Association for Symbolic Logic.
The gödel paradox and Wittgenstein's reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
On gödel's ontological proof.A. P. Hazen - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):361 – 377.


Added to PP

145 (#101,585)

6 months
8 (#119,123)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?