Order:
Disambiguations
James Hardy [8]James Daniel Hardy [1]James Hintze Hardy [1]James Hardy Jr [1]
  1.  52
    Is Yablo's Paradox Liar-Like?James Hardy - 1995 - Analysis 55 (3):197 - 198.
  2.  3
    Endorsement and Constructive Criticism of an Innovative Online Reflexive Self-Talk Intervention.Alexander T. Latinjak, Cristina Hernando-Gimeno, Luz Lorido-Méndez & James Hardy - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
  3.  8
    Non-Conscious Visual Cues Related to Affect and Action Alter Perception of Effort and Endurance Performance.Anthony Blanchfield, James Hardy & Samuele Marcora - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  4. How to Catch Achilles:* An Introduction to the Theory of Infinitals.James Hardy - 2004 - Logique Et Analyse 185 (47):425-444.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Magical Realism in the Tales of Nikolai Gogol.James Hardy Jr & Leonard Stanton - 2002 - Janus Head 5 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  49
    Three Problems for the Singularity Theory of Truth.James Hardy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):501-520.
    In this paper I present three problems for Simmons' singularity theory of truth as he presents it in Universality and the Liar. I begin with a brief overview of the theory and then present the three problems I see for it. The first problem shows that the singularity theory is in conflict with our ordinary notion of truth. I present a set of sentences that the singularity theory evaluates differently than does our pretheoretic concept of truth. The second problem shows (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  35
    Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
    Proponents of modal versions of the ontological argument have traditionally defended the prernise that God possibly exists by arguing that such a premise is more plausible than its negation. In this paper I argue that such a defense is insufficient to justify acceptance of the premise within the scope of a modal proof, and that this insufficiency accounts for the lack of probative force of these versions of the ontological argument. Rather, I claim that what is needed is a defense (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  7
    Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
    Proponents of modal versions of the ontological argument have traditionally defended the prernise that God possibly exists by arguing that such a premise is more plausible than its negation. In this paper I argue that such a defense is insufficient to justify acceptance of the premise within the scope of a modal proof, and that this insufficiency accounts for the lack of probative force of these versions of the ontological argument. Rather, I claim that what is needed is a defense (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  1
    Big Hitters: Important Factors Characterizing Team Effectiveness in Professional Cricket.Leonie V. Webster, James Hardy & Lew Hardy - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark