Some Remarks on the Modal Ontological Argument

Philo 12 (2):217-227 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper examines the so-called modal ontological argument. It pays special attention to the role that the symmetry and transitivity of the accessibility relation play in the argument, and examines various approaches to a defense of the “possibility premise,” the premise of the argument that states that the existence of a perfect being is metaphysically possible. It contains an analysis of Gödel’s attempt to show that this premise is true, and of a recent formulation by David Johnson of Gödel’s argument.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Logical Choice.Tracy Lupher - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):237-246.
Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
The Modal Ontological Argument Meets Modal Fictionalism.Ted Parent - 2016 - Analytic Philosophy 57 (4):338-352.
God and empty terms.Charles Sayward - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):149 - 152.
The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism.David Chalmers - 2009 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Sven Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
The Modal Argument is Not Circular.Richard Swinburne - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):371-372.
Modal collapse in Gödel's ontological proof.Srećko Kovač - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--323.


Added to PP

292 (#70,575)

6 months
30 (#107,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Van Inwagen
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references