Change and Contradiction in Henry of Ghent

Vivarium 55 (1-3):22-35 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hugh of Novocastro, Landolfo Caracciolo, John Baconthorpe, and some other medieval authors argued that there are real contradictions in nature. The background of this early fourteenth-century theory was the Aristotelian question of how to determine the instant of change between p and ~p. The argument was that these are simultaneously true at the temporal instant of change if it is an instant of changing. The author’s aim is to discuss the background of this view in Henry of Ghent’s theory of instantaneous change from potentiality to actuality at that very instant.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Henry of ghent on the reality of non-existing possibles – revisited.Richard Cross - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (2):115-132.
Henry of Ghent: Metaphysics and the Trinity.Juan Carlos Flores - 2006 - Leuven University Press. Edited by Henry.
Henry of Ghent on Teaching Theology.Joke Spruyt - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (1-3):165-183.
Henry of Ghent’s Argument for Divine Illumination Reconsidered.Patrick J. Connolly - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):47-68.
Intelligible species in the mature thought of Henry of ghent.Michael E. Rombeiro - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):181-220.
Relatio as modus essendi : The origins of Henry of ghent's definition of relation.Jos Decorte - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (3):309 – 336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
68 (#239,525)

6 months
15 (#166,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Negation and Temporal Ontology.Tero Tulenheimo - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):101-114.

Add more references