Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (4):642-665 (2017)
AbstractThis essay seeks to clarify the meaning and nature of normativity in metaethics and offers reasons why comparative religious ethics must properly address questions about normativity. Though many comparative religious ethicists take CRE to be a normative discipline, what they say about normativity is often unclear and confusing. I argue that the third-wave scholars face serious questions with respect to not only the justification of moral belief but also the rationality of moral belief and action. These scholars tend to view the justification of moral belief to be a matter of process rather than evidence-possession, thus overlooking crucial differences between the two. They also run the risk of confusing motivating and explanatory reasons with normative reasons for moral belief and action. Consequently, their account of normativity would be insufficient for determining the rationality of moral beliefs and actions as well as for justifying moral beliefs.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Why Philosophy Matters for the Study of Religion - & Vice Versa.Thomas A. Lewis - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
Ethnography, Anthropology, and Comparative Religious Ethics: Or Ethnography and the Comparative Religious Ethics Local.Thomas A. Lewis - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):395-403.
Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay.Kevin Schilbrack - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):297-312.
On Comparative Religious Ethics as a Field of Study.Elizabeth M. Bucar & Aaron Stalnaker - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (2):358-384.
Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Kevin Schilbrack - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”.Aaron Stalnaker - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
Comparative Religious Ethics Among the Ruins.Jung Lee - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):571-584.
Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Rethinking the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (3):525-542.
Max Weber and the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):5 - 40.
What's in a List?:A Rule of Interpretation for Hindu Dharma Offered in Response to Maria Hibbets.Ariel Glucklich - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):463-469.
References found in this work
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.
The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding.Michael Huemer - 2004 - Mind 113 (452):763-766.
Citations of this work
Can Memory Erasure Contribute to a Virtuous Tempering of Emotions?Aleksandar Fatic - 2019 - Filozofija I Društvo 30 (2):257-269.
Christian Formation and Moral Pluralism: Challenges and Opportunities.Darlene Fozard Weaver - 2020 - Studies in Christian Ethics 33 (1):27-39.