Building A General Theory of Meta‐Argumentation

Metaphilosophy 48 (3):345-354 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents a critical analysis of the main modern approaches to the problem of meta-argumentation and suggests a method for developing a general conception of meta-argumentation. A set of theoretical-methodological difficulties along this path is revealed. Overcoming these aporias would constitute the main steps toward developing the body of a theory of meta-argumentation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Agentive Approach to Argumentation. Nino - 2015 - In Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 53-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-25

Downloads
27 (#589,634)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Introduction to Metamathematics.Ann Singleterry Ferebee - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):290-291.
Discourse on Method.René Descartes - 1900 - The Monist 10:472.
Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant & Raymund Schmidt - 1924 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 4 (3):30-31.

View all 15 references / Add more references