Noumenal Affection

Philosophical Review 118 (4):501-532 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A central doctrine of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason holds that the content of human experience is rooted in an affection of sensibility by unknowable things in themselves. This famous and puzzling affection doctrine raises two seemingly intractable old problems, which can be termed the Indispensability and the Consistency Problems. By what right does Kant present affection by supersensible entities as an indispensable requirement of experience? And how could any argument for such indispensability avoid violating the Critique's doctrine of noumenal ignorance? This essay develops a new solution to both problems, setting out from the continuity between Kant's early and mature views on sensibility and mind-world relations. Kant's early writings subscribe to an interactionist cosmology opposed to both Leibniz's preestablished harmony and Malebranche's occasionalism. The modern debate on mind-world relations shaping Kant's early cosmology points us to a widely recognized motivation for interactionism, turning on a constraint on agency within certain noninteractionist cosmologies. In particular, Kant's early conversion to a libertarian theory of freedom, together with his rejection of occasionalism, provides the basis for a compelling argument for the indispensability of world-mind affection relations. Extended to the transcendental idealist framework, the same argument reveals noumenal affection as an indispensable presupposition of some knowledge claims consistently upheld by Kant. This leads in turn to a satisfying solution to the Consistency Problem, showing that the doctrine of noumenal affection is not merely consistent with, but is partly motivated by, Kant's commitment to noumenal ignorance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Vagaries of Chiba's Idealism. [REVIEW]Henny Blomme - 2013 - Critique. A Philosophical Review Bulletin 12.
Who’s Afraid of Double Affection?Nicholas Stang - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
Is mencius' doctrine of 'extending affection' tenable?Qingping Liu - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (1):79 – 90.
L'affection et l'intuition chez maine de biran.François Azouvi - forthcoming - Les Etudes Philosophiques.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-01

Downloads
345 (#51,304)

6 months
43 (#81,172)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Desmond Hogan
Princeton University

References found in this work

Kant.Allen W. Wood - 2004 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kant on Transcendental Freedom1.Derk Pereboom - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):537-567.
Leibniz: Physics and philosophy.Daniel Garber - 1995 - In Nicholas Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press. pp. 270--352.
Kant. [REVIEW]Allen Wood - 1991 - International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):323-325.

Add more references