Chromosome Screening Using Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Beyond Trisomy-21: What to Screen for and Why It Matters
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (1):8-21 (2018)
AbstractWith the new and highly accurate noninvasive prenatal test, new options for screening become available. I contend that the current state of the art of NIPT is already in need of a thorough ethical investigation and that there are different points to consider before any chromosomal or subchromosomal condition is added to the screening panel of a publicly funded screening program. Moreover, the application of certain ethical principles makes the inclusion of some conditions unethical in a privately funded scheme, even if such screening would enhance a woman’s reproductive autonomy. On the one hand, a screening program aimed solely at the detection of Down syndrome is subject to the technological imperative and should be reassessed in the light of technologies that allow for the detection of conditions that are at least as severe. On the other hand, some chromosomal conditions should not be included in any screening programs, because this would violate certain ethical principles, such as the right of the future child to genetic privacy.
Similar books and articles
To Transfer or Not to Transfer: The Case of Comprehensive Chromosome Screening of the In Vitro Embryo. [REVIEW]Kristien Hens - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):197-206.
Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context.Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky, Rayna Rapp, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan & Megan Allyse - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (2):41-49.
Prenatal Screening: An Ethical Agenda for the Near Future.Antina Jong & Guido M. W. R. Wert - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):46-55.
“The Ethics of Genetic Testing”.G. T. Roche - 2013 - In Roy Beran (ed.), Legal and Forensic Medicine. pp. 1519- 1533..
A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (1):35-53.
Unjustified: The Imbalance of Information and Funding With Noninvasive Prenatal Screening.Mark W. Leach - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):21-30.
Permissibility or Priority? Testing or Screening? Essential Distinctions in the Ethics of Prenatal Testing.Christian Munthe - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):30-32.
Hoping Someday Never Comes: Deferring Ethical Thinking About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.Jessica Mozersky - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):31-41.
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy in Argentina.Lucas Otaño & Laura Igarzábal - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):111-114.
Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.Marsha Michie & Megan Allyse - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):1-4.
Printing Unrealistic Expectations: A Closer Look at Newspaper Representations of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.Anjali R. Truitt & Michael H. V. Nguyen - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (1):68-80.
Women's Views on the Moral Status of Nature in the Context of Prenatal Screening Decisions.E. Garcia, D. R. M. Timmermans & E. van Leeuwen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):461-465.
Eugenics and Mandatory Informed Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Unique Perspective From China.Vincent H. di ZhangNg, Zhaochen Wang, Xiaomei Zhai & Reidar K. Lie - 2016 - Developing World Bioethics 16 (2):107-115.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Postponed Fatherhood.Kristien Hens - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):103-118.
Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Philosophy Through a Wide-Angle Lens.Janet Malek - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (1):1-7.
References found in this work
A New Ethical Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Individualizing Choice to Serve Autonomy and Promote Public Health: A Radical Proposal.Christian Munthe - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):36-45.
Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health.Stephen Wilkinson - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):26-35.
For Your Interest? The Ethical Acceptability of Using Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing to Test ‘Purely for Information’.Zuzana Deans, Angus J. Clarke & Ainsley J. Newson - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):19-25.
Prenatal Screening: Current Practice, New Developments, Ethical Challenges.Antina Jong, Idit Maya & Jan M. M. Lith - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):1-8.
Dynamics of Prenatal Screening: New Developments Challenging the Ethical Framework.Wybo Dondorp & Jan Lith - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):ii-iv.