Order:
  1.  77
    Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
    Prenatal screening, consisting of maternal serum screening and nuchal translucency screening, is on the verge of expansion, both by being offered to more pregnant women and by screening for more conditions. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have each recently recommended that screening be extended to all pregnant women regardless of age, disease history, or risk status. This screening is commonly justified by appeal to the value of autonomy, or women's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2.  75
    The Myth of the Gendered Chromosome: Sex Selection and the Social Interest.Victoria Seavilleklein & Susan Sherwin - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):7-19.
    Sex selection technologies have become increasingly prevalent and accessible. We can find them advertised widely across the Internet and discussed in the popular media—an entry for “sex selection services” on Google generated 859,000 sites in April 2004. The available services fall into three main types: preconception sperm sorting followed either by intrauterine insemination of selected sperm or by in vitro fertilization ; preimplantation genetic diagnosis, by which embryos created by IVF are tested and only those of the desired sex are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  3.  2
    Refocusing the Lens: A Commentary on "Relational Autonomy as a Theoretical Lens for Qualitative Health Research" by Jennifer A. H. Bell.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):103-107.
    Jennifer Bell applies Susan Sherwin's theory of relational autonomy as a lens to qualitative health research to study patient decision-making in cancer clinical trials. Interestingly, her broader goal is to enhance patient decision-making in the healthcare context1 rather than the research one. This goal relies on a silent assumption that knowledge gained in a research context is easily transferable to the healthcare context. It also leaves unexplored the promise—and peril—of the application of her work in a research context.Bell's goal to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark