Is liberal nationalism incompatible with global democracy?

Metaphilosophy 40 (1):109-130 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: To respond to globalization-related challenges, many contemporary political theorists have argued for forms of democracy beyond the level of the nation-state. Since the early 1990s, however, political theory has also witnessed a renewed normative defense of nationhood. Liberal nationalists have been influential in claiming that the state should protect and promote national identities, and that it is desirable that the boundaries of national and political units coincide. At first glance, both positions—global democracy and nationalism—seem to contradict each other. We do not share this oppositional picture. Developing a more harmonic picture of nationalist ideals and cosmopolitan visions is the aim of this essay.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-19

Downloads
52 (#305,709)

6 months
3 (#969,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Federative global democracy.Eric Cavallero - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (1):42-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Nationality.David Miller - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
National responsibility and global justice.David Miller - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):383-399.
Liberal Nationalism.Yael Tamir - 1995 - Ethics 105 (3):626-645.

View all 15 references / Add more references