Ethical tensions in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric and newborn care in low and middle-income countries

BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):27 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is unanimous agreement regarding the need to ethically conduct research for improving therapy for patients admitted to hospital with acute conditions, including in emergency obstetric care. We present a conceptual analysis of ethical tensions inherent in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials for emergency obstetric care and suggest ways in which these could be mitigated. A valid consenting process, leading to an informed consent, is a cornerstone of this aspect necessary for preservation and maintenance of respect for autonomy and dignity. In emergency obstetric care research, obtaining informed consent can be problematic, leading to ethical tension between different moral considerations. Potential participants may be vulnerable due to severity of disease, powerlessness or impaired decisional capacity. Time for the consent process is limited, and some interventions have a narrow therapeutic window. These factors create ethical tension in allowing potentially beneficial research while avoiding potential harms and maintaining respect for dignity, human rights, justice and autonomy of the participants. Informed consent in emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries poses numerous ethical challenges. Allowing research on vulnerable populations while maintaining respect for participant dignity and autonomy, protecting participants from potential harms and promoting justice underlie the ethical tensions in the research in emergency obstetric and newborn care. Those involved in research conduct or oversight have a duty of fair inclusion, to avoid denying participants the right to participate and to any potential research benefits.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,635

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed Consent in Emergency Research: A Contradiction in Terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Informed Consent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Research.Anne Gammelgaard - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):417 – 434.
Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.Oonagh Corrigan - 2003 - Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3):768-792.
Ethical Challenges in Implementation Research.R. Macklin - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (1):86-93.
Informed Consent Doesn't Exist in AMI Trials.F. Verdu-Pascual - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):190-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-28

Downloads
5 (#1,160,450)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?