Ethical tensions in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric and newborn care in low and middle-income countries
BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):27 (2019)
AbstractThere is unanimous agreement regarding the need to ethically conduct research for improving therapy for patients admitted to hospital with acute conditions, including in emergency obstetric care. We present a conceptual analysis of ethical tensions inherent in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials for emergency obstetric care and suggest ways in which these could be mitigated. A valid consenting process, leading to an informed consent, is a cornerstone of this aspect necessary for preservation and maintenance of respect for autonomy and dignity. In emergency obstetric care research, obtaining informed consent can be problematic, leading to ethical tension between different moral considerations. Potential participants may be vulnerable due to severity of disease, powerlessness or impaired decisional capacity. Time for the consent process is limited, and some interventions have a narrow therapeutic window. These factors create ethical tension in allowing potentially beneficial research while avoiding potential harms and maintaining respect for dignity, human rights, justice and autonomy of the participants. Informed consent in emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries poses numerous ethical challenges. Allowing research on vulnerable populations while maintaining respect for participant dignity and autonomy, protecting participants from potential harms and promoting justice underlie the ethical tensions in the research in emergency obstetric and newborn care. Those involved in research conduct or oversight have a duty of fair inclusion, to avoid denying participants the right to participate and to any potential research benefits.
Similar books and articles
Involvement and (Potential) Influence of Care Providers in the Enlistment Phase of the Informed Consent Process: The Case of Aids Clinical Trials.Mary-Rose Mueller - 2004 - Nursing Ethics 11 (1):42-52.
Informed Consent Procedure for Clinical Trials in Emergency Settings: The Polish Perspective.Piotr S. Iwanowski - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):333-336.
Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed Consent in Health Research: Challenges and Barriers in Low‐and Middle‐Income Countries with Specific Reference to Nepal.R. Regmi Pramod, Aryal Nirmal, Kurmi Om, Pant Puspa Raj, Teijlingen Edwin & P. Wasti Sharada - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics 17 (2):84-89.
Informed Consent and the Use of Placebo in Poland: Ethical and Legal Aspects. [REVIEW]Prof Piotr Zaborowski & Adam Górski - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):167-178.
Clinical Trialist Perspectives on the Ethics of Adaptive Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.Laurie J. Legocki, William J. Meurer, Shirley Frederiksen, Roger J. Lewis, Valerie L. Durkalski, Donald A. Berry, William G. Barsan & Michael D. Fetters - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):27.
Informed Consent in Emergency Research: A Contradiction in Terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Informed Consent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Research.Anne Gammelgaard - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):417 – 434.
Confusions in the Equipoise Concept and the Alternative of Fully Informed Overlapping Rational Decisions.David W. Chambers - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):133-142.
Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.Oonagh Corrigan - 2003 - Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3):768-792.
Reporting of Informed Consent, Standard of Care and Post‐Trial Obligations in Global Randomized Intervention Trials: A Systematic Survey of Registered Trials.Jennifer M. O'neill Emma R. Cohen - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (2):74-80.
Research Without Consent: Exception From and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Informed Consent and the Use of Placebo in Poland: Ethical and Legal Aspects.Piotr Zaborowski & Adam Górski - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):167-178.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.C. G. Foster - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):123-124.
What Makes a Problem an Ethical Problem? An Empirical Perspective on the Nature of Ethical Problems in General Practice.A. J. Braunack-Mayer - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):98-103.
“Hello, Hello—It's English I Speak!”: A Qualitative Exploration of Patients' Understanding of the Science of Clinical Trials.M. Stead - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):664-669.
How Should Risks and Benefits Be Balanced in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses?C. Strong - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (6):1-5.
The Value of Respect in Human Research Ethics: A Coneptual Analysis and a Practical Guide.Ian Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomason - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):232-253.