- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Person-Affecting/Identity-Affecting Distinction between Forms of Human Germline Genome Editing Is Useless in Practical Ethics
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):49-51 (2022)
Abstract
Would direct genetic modification of human embryos affect the welfare of future persons? Sparrow’s approach to answering this question fails a core goal of bioethics: to generate perspectives capab...My notes
Similar books and articles
Theoretical vs Practical Reasons: Derek Parfit and Bioethics.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):1-3.
Reconceptualizing Identity and Ethics in the Context of Conception.Janet Malek - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):42-44.
The Enduring Allure of Person-Affecting Arguments for Reproductive Technologies.I. Glenn Cohen & Eli Y. Adashi - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):44-46.
Reasons to Genome Edit and Metaphysical Essentialism about Human Identity.Tomasz Żuradzki & Vilius Dranseika - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):34-36.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Donna Dickenson - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (1):75-77.
Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement.Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews, Alan Regenberg & On Behalf of the Hinxton Group - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.Derek So - 2021 - Bioethics 36 (5):556-568.
Trojan Horses, Clinical Utility, and Parfitian Puzzles.Bryan Cwik - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):16-18.
What Are the Wider Implications of Sparrow’s Benefit Argument?David Wasserman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):28-30.
Evaluating the Lives of Others.Rosemarie Garland-Thomson - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):30-33.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-08-31
Downloads
161 (#119,470)
6 months
110 (#47,355)
2022-08-31
Downloads
161 (#119,470)
6 months
110 (#47,355)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Personal Identity.David Shoemaker & Kevin P. Tobia - 2022 - In Manuel Vargas & John Doris (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
Intuitions about personal identity: An empirical study.Shaun Nichols & Michael Bruno - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (3):293-312.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo