Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):37-56 (2012)

Authors
Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor
Abstract
Carneades is an open source argument mapping application and a programming library for building argumentation support tools. In this paper, Carneades’ support for argument reconstruction, evaluation and visualization is illustrated by modeling most of the factual and legal arguments in Popov v Hayashi
Keywords Argumentation  Visualization  Case-based reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argumentation Schemes in AI and Law.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):417-434.
Baseballs and Arguments From Fairness.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 22 (4):423-449.
Before and After Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):221-238.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Representing Popov V Hayashi with Dimensions and Factors.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):15-35.
Introduction to Special Issue on Modelling Popov V. Hayashi.Katie Atkinson - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):1-14.
Atheism and Moral Responsibility.L. A. Popov - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):73-85.
Community and Utopia: A Transcendental Deduction.Stefan Popov - 1990 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (4):291-302.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
No Reconstruction, No Impenetrability (at Least Not Much).Shimon Edelman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):376-376.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-28

Total views
56 ( #202,946 of 2,506,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes