Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors

Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):15-35 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modelling reasoning with legal cases has been a central concern of AI and Law since the 1980s. The approach which represents cases as factors and dimensions has been a central part of that work. In this paper I consider how several varieties of the approach can be applied to the interesting case of Popov v Hayashi. After briefly reviewing some of the key landmarks of the approach, the case is represented in terms of factors and dimensions, and further explored using theory construction and argumentation schemes approaches

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10506-012-9118-7

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi.Thomas F. Gordon & Douglas Walton - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):37-56.
Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi.Katie Atkinson - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):1-14.
Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics.Henry Prakken - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):57-82.
A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi.Adam Wyner & Rinke Hoekstra - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):83-107.
A note on dimensions and factors.Edwina L. Rissland & Kevin D. Ashley - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):65-77.
A typology of situational factors: Impact on salesperson decision-making about ethical issues. [REVIEW]William T. Ross & Diana C. Robertson - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (3):213 - 234.
Atheism and Moral Responsibility.L. A. Popov - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):73-85.
Kyōyō to shite no rinrigaku.Shigeo Hayashi - 1977
Community and utopia: A transcendental deduction.Stefan Popov - 1990 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (4):291-302.
The Term `True Dream ( Satya-Svapna )' in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition.Keijin Hayashi - 2001 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (5/6):559-574.
The logic of Aristotle and formal logic.P. S. Popov - 1947 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (1):1-22.
Physician obligation to provide care during disasters: should physicians have been required to go to Fukushima?Akira Akabayashi, Yoshiyuki Takimoto & Yoshinori Hayashi - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (11):697-698.
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application.Alison Chorley & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):323-371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-28

Downloads
61 (#253,035)

6 months
14 (#151,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Argumentation schemes in AI and Law.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):417-434.
HYPO's legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning.Henry Prakken - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):113-133.
Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics.Giovanni Sartor - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):95-112.
A note on dimensions and factors.Edwina L. Rissland & Kevin D. Ashley - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):65-77.

View all 8 references / Add more references