Can an Ancient Argument of Carneades on Cardinal Virtues and Divine Attributes be Used to Disprove the Existence of God?

Philo 2 (2):5-13 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An ancient argument attributed to the philosopher Carneades is presented that raises critical questions about the concept of an all-virtuous Divine being. The argument is based on the premises that virtue involves overcoming pains and dangers, and that only a being that can suffer or be destroyed is one for whom there are pains and dangers. The conclusion is that an all-virtuous Divine (perfect) being cannot exist. After presenting this argument, reconstructed from sources in Sextus Empiricus and Cicero, this paper goes on to model it as a deductively valid sequence of reasoning. The paper also discusses whet her the premises are true. Questions about the possibility and value of proving and disproving the existence of God by logical reasoning are raised, as well as ethical questions about how the cardinal ethical virtues should be defined.

Similar books and articles

Divine hiddenness and the demographics of theism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (2):177-191.
Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas Williams.
Aquinas on Divine Simplicity.John Lamont - 1997 - The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
The divine attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.
Spinoza's Deification of Existence.Yitzhak Y. Melamed - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:75-104.
On the cardinality of the cardinal virtues.David S. Oderberg - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (3):305 – 322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
349 (#52,710)

6 months
84 (#44,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references