Atheism and Moral Responsibility

Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):73-85 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of responsibility has always been an important factor in moral teachings, for this is a problem not only of theory but of everyday practical life. Any system of moral precepts will be lifeless if it does not postulate some measure of responsibility of an individual for his acts. An unselfish, disinterested life becomes morally damaging if a person cannot foresee the moral consequences of his acts and their effects on the lives of those around him, or if the individual's behavior does not correspond to his convictions and good will but is dictated only by external circumstances

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasonable atheism: a moral case for respectful disbelief.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Robert B. Talisse.
Kant's criticism of atheism.Lara Denis - 2003 - Kant Studien 94 (2):198-219.
Atheism, Amorality, and Animals.Joel Marks - 2011 - The New York Times.
Atheism: A Very Short Introduction.Julian Baggini - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Moral responsibility, authenticity, and education.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2008 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Stefaan E. Cuypers.
Responsibility.Garrath Williams - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
An Amoral Manifesto Part I.Joel Marks - 2010 - Philosophy Now (80):30-33.
An Amoral Manifesto Part II.Joel Marks - 2010 - Philosophy Now (81):23-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-11

Downloads
9 (#1,154,504)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references