- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future
Artificial Intelligence 289 (C):103387 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument (TREVOR JM BENCH-CAPON).G. C. Christie - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):59-71.
Representing dimensions within the reason model of precedent.Adam Rigoni - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (1):1-22.
A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence.M. Haenlein & A. Kaplan - 2019 - California Management Review 61.
AI, Law and beyond. A transdisciplinary ecosystem for the future of AI & Law.Floris J. Bex - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-18.
AI Winter.Steven Umbrello - 2021 - In Michael Klein & Philip Frana (eds.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence: The Past, Present, and Future of Ai. Abc-Clio. pp. 7-8.
AI, faith, and the future: an interdisciplinary approach.Michael J. Paulus & Michael D. Langford (eds.) - 2022 - Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.
Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design.Bart Verheij - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):387-407.
In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Floris Bex, Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (3):281-326.
The Facets of Artificial Intelligence: A Framework to Track the Evolution of AI.Fernando Martínez-Plumed, Bao Sheng Loe, Peter Flach, Sean O. O. HEigeartaigh, Karina Vold & José Hernández-Orallo - 2018 - In Fernando Martínez-Plumed, Bao Sheng Loe, Peter Flach, Sean O. O. HEigeartaigh, Karina Vold & José Hernández-Orallo (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Evolution of the contours of AI. pp. 5180-5187.
Pragmatism and purism in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.Dr Richard Susskind - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (1):28-38.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#671,079)
6 months
9 (#437,668)
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#671,079)
6 months
9 (#437,668)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: Formalisation and experiments.Henry Prakken & Rosa Ratsma - 2022 - Argument and Computation 13 (2):159-194.
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade.Giovanni Sartor, Michał Araszkiewicz, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Tom van Engers, Enrico Francesconi, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sileno, Frank Schilder, Adam Wyner & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):521-557.
The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in law: Presidential address to the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.Enrico Francesconi - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (2):147-161.
Value Alignment for Advanced Artificial Judicial Intelligence.Christoph Winter, Nicholas Hollman & David Manheim - 2023 - American Philosophical Quarterly 60 (2):187-203.
AI, Law and beyond. A transdisciplinary ecosystem for the future of AI & Law.Floris J. Bex - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-18.
References found in this work
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences.Tim Miller - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 267 (C):1-38.
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning.H. Prakken & G. Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values.Trevor Bench-Capon & Giovanni Sartor - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 150 (1-2):97-143.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo