Business ethics, ideology, and the naturalistic fallacy

Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):227 - 232 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper addresses the relationship between theoretical and applied ethics. It directs philosophical attention toward the concept of ideology, conceived as a bridge between high-level principles and decision-making practice. How are we to understand this bridge and how can we avoid the naturalistic fallacy while taking ideology seriously?It is then suggested that the challenge posed by ideology in the arena of organizational ethics is in many ways similar to the challenge posed by developmentalist accounts of moral stages in the arena of individual ethics, namely, how to account for the normative force of frameworks that are theoretically derivative yet practically essential.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Normative contexts and moral decision.Michael Philips - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):233 - 237.
The Ethics of Maximizing or Satisficing.Brandon William Soltwisch, Daniel C. Brannon & Vish Iyer - 2020 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 39 (1):77-96.
Philosophy in the Business Arena.Geoffrey Klempner - 2009 - Philosophical Practice 4 (1):376-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
108 (#161,141)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth E. Goodpaster
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

References found in this work

Add more references