Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):297-329 (2013)
AbstractIn response to criticism of empirical or “positive” approaches to corporate social responsibility, we defend the importance of these approaches for any CSR theory that seeks to have practical impact. Although we acknowledge limitations to positive approaches, we unpack the neglected but crucial relationships between positive knowledge on the one hand and normative knowledge on the other in the implementation of CSR principles. Using the structure of a practical syllogism, we construct a model that displays the key role of empirical knowledge in fulfilling a firm’s responsibility to society, paying special attention to the implications of the “ought implies can” dictum. We also defend the importance of one particular class of empirical claims; namely, claims from the field of economics. Even positive economic theory, which is often criticized for endorsing profits rather than values, can cooperate in intriguing ways with non-economic concepts in the implementation of CSR goals.
Similar books and articles
1. the relation between positive and normative economics confusion between positive and normative economics is to some extent inevitable. The subject matter of economics is regarded by almost everyone from essays in positive economics (chicago: University of chicago press, 1953), part I, sections 1, 2, 3, and 6.Positive Economics & Milton Friedman - 1979 - In Frank Hahn & Martin Hollis (eds.), Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 18.
Methodologische Probleme der Kooperation von Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaft.Petros Gemtos - 2003 - Analyse & Kritik 25 (1):41-59.
Differential Economic Impacts of Corporate Responsibility Issues.Leena Lankoski - 2009 - Business and Society 48 (2):206-224.
Making sense of economists' positive-normative distinction.David Colander & Huei-Chun Su - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2):157-170.
The history of transaction cost economics and its recent developments.Lukasz Hardt - 2009 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):29.
World Poverty as a Problem of Justice? A Critical Comparison of Three Approaches.Corinna Mieth - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):15-36.
Modern Economics as Social Psychology: Escaping the Moral Dilemma of the Invisible Hand.Garrick R. Small - 2000 - Catholic Social Science Review 5:283-295.
Positive business: doing good and doing well.Marcel Meyer - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):175-197.
The Boundaries of Technique: Ordering Positive and Normative Concerns in Economic Research.Andrew Yuengert - 2004 - Lexington Books.
Why did the economist cross the road? The hierarchical logic of ethical and economic reasoning.Andrew Yuengert - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):329-349.
Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences.David S. Bright, Bradley A. Winn & Jason Kanov - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 119 (4):1-16.
The Methodology of Positive Economics.Milton Friedman - 1953 - In Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press. pp. 3-43.
Catholic Social Teaching and the Market Economy Revisted: A Reply to Thomas Storck.Thomas E. Woods - 2009 - Catholic Social Science Review 14:107-124.
A Behavioral Schema to the Impact of Corporate Responsibility on Customer and EmployeeRelationships.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:196-200.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives.Jędrzej George Frynas & Camila Yamahaki - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (3):258-285.
The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes.Ante Glavas & Ken Kelley - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (2):165-202.
Board Gender Quotas: Exploring Ethical Tensions From A Multi-Theoretical Perspective.Siri Terjesen & Ruth Sealy - 2016 - Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (1):23-65.
Engaging Ethically: A Discourse Ethics Perspective on Social Shareholder Engagement.Jennifer Goodman & Daniel Arenas - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (2):163-189.
A Qualified Account of Supererogation: Toward a Better Conceptualization of Corporate Social Responsibility.Antonio Tencati, Nicola Misani & Sandro Castaldo - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (2):250-272.
References found in this work
Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. [REVIEW]Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
Ethical Theory and Business.Tom L. Beauchamp, Norman E. Bowie & Denis Gordon Arnold (eds.) - 2008 - Pearson/Prentice Hall.