Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):297-329 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
In response to criticism of empirical or “positive” approaches to corporate social responsibility, we defend the importance of these approaches for any CSR theory that seeks to have practical impact. Although we acknowledge limitations to positive approaches, we unpack the neglected but crucial relationships between positive knowledge on the one hand and normative knowledge on the other in the implementation of CSR principles. Using the structure of a practical syllogism, we construct a model that displays the key role of empirical knowledge in fulfilling a firm’s responsibility to society, paying special attention to the implications of the “ought implies can” dictum. We also defend the importance of one particular class of empirical claims; namely, claims from the field of economics. Even positive economic theory, which is often criticized for endorsing profits rather than values, can cooperate in intriguing ways with non-economic concepts in the implementation of CSR goals.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1052-150X
DOI beq201323218
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.

View all 71 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Positive Public Economics: Reinterpreting ‘Optimal’ Policies.Brian C. Albrecht - 2017 - Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (1):90-103.
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.Christoph Lumer - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.
Making Sense of Economists' Positive-Normative Distinction.David Colander & Huei-Chun Su - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2):157-170.
The History of Transaction Cost Economics and its Recent Developments.Lukasz Hardt - 2009 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):29-51.
Positive Business: Doing Good and Doing Well.Marcel Meyer - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):175-197.
Is Milton Friedman an Artist or a Scientist?David Colander - 1995 - Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (1):105-122.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-12

Total views
50 ( #218,264 of 2,463,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,463,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes