Universal, basic and instantial statements in the logic of scientific discovery

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (4):355-356 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does scientific discovery have a logic?Herbert A. Simon - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (4):471-480.
Laws and instantial statements.Alex Blum - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (4):371-378.
A.I., Scientific discovery and realism.Mario Alai - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (1):21-42.
Discovery and its logic: Popper and the "friends of discovery".Claude Savary - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):318-344.
Conventionalism, scientific discovery and the sociology of knowledge.Angelo M. Petroni - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):225-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#194,283)

6 months
15 (#164,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1965 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 11 references / Add more references