Does scientific discovery have a logic?

Philosophy of Science 40 (4):471-480 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is often claimed that there can be no such thing as a logic of scientific discovery, but only a logic of verification. By 'logic of discovery' is usually meant a normative theory of discovery processes. The claim that such a normative theory is impossible is shown to be incorrect; and two examples are provided of domains where formal processes of varying efficacy for discovering lawfulness can be constructed and compared. The analysis shows how one can treat operationally and formally phenomena that have usually been dismissed with fuzzy labels like 'intuition' and 'creativity'



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discovery and its logic: Popper and the "friends of discovery".Claude Savary - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):318-344.
A.I., Scientific discovery and realism.Mario Alai - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (1):21-42.
Is it justifiable to abandon all search for a logic of discovery?Mehul Shah - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):253 – 269.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
Herbert Simon's Computational Models of Scientific Discovery.Stephen Downes - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:97-108.
The logic of discovery.Kevin T. Kelly - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):435-452.


Added to PP

222 (#91,008)

6 months
57 (#81,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?