Being, truth and meaning in Quine's philosophy

Philosophica 19 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I shall examine the interrelationships holding between four of the main theses of Quine's philosophy. (1)Ho1ism (2)Underdetennination of scientific theories (3) Indeterminacy of translation (4) Ontological Relativity These four doctrines have generated a lasting controversy: in one interpretation they seem to be false and in the other they are threatened to collapse into triviality. Moreover it has been claimed that they cannot be consistently upheld together. I shall argue, on the contrary, that they are true, original and mutually consistent.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
35 (#639,350)

6 months
6 (#835,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199–219.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation.W. V. Quine - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (6):178-183.
The nature of natural knowledge.Willard V. Quine - 1975 - In Samuel D. Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and language. Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. pp. 1975--67.
Quine's empirical assumptions.Noam Chomsky - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):53 - 68.
The Duhemian Argument.Adolf Grünbaum - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):75 - 87.
Replies.W. V. Quine - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):264 - 322.

View all 8 references / Add more references