Gonseth and Quine

Dialectica 55 (3):199-219 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper compares the four principles of Gonseth's epistemology with Quine's “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. It is shown how Gonseth's epistemology avoids the main objections to Quine's holism. On this basis, the relevance of Gonseth's epistemology for today's discussion is assessed.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/dltc.2001.55.issue-3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199–219.
Sur la méthode de Ferdinand Gonseth.Jules Vuillemin - 1990 - Dialectica 44 (3‐4):225-228.
Every dogma has its day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
Analyticity and Epistemology.Paul K. Moser - 1992 - Dialectica 46 (1):3-19.
L'axiomatique de Gonseth Essai Sur Un Réalisme Mathématique.Mohamad Sami Adham - 1987 - A.N.R.T. Université de Lille Iii.
W. V. Quine.Arif Ahmed - 2008 - In Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Oxford handbook of American philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 290-338.
Philosophie ouverte de F. Gonseth et philosophie analytique.Eric Emery-Hellwig - 1994 - Dialectica 48 (2):143-155.
Generalizing and Normalizing Quine's Epistemology.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2002 - Philosophical Writings 19:3-21.
Espace et horizon de réalité: philosophie mathématique de Ferdinand Gonseth.Marco Panza & Jean-Claude Pont - 1992
La philosophie des sciences de Ferdinand Gonseth.Edmond Bertholet - 1968 - [Lausanne]: Éd. l'Age d'homme.
Quine's ‘needlessly strong’ holism.Sander Verhaegh - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:11-20.
How Not to Refute Quine: Evaluating Kim's Alternatives to Naturalized Epistemology.Benjamin Bayer - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):473-495.
Quine's ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’: or The Power of Bad Logic.Geoffrey Hunter - 1995 - Philosophical Investigations 18 (4):305-328.
The Quine/Wittgenstein Controversy: Any Role for Feminist Empiricism in It?Pieranna Garavaso - 1999 - Epistemologia 22 (1):63-90.
Naturalismo y la autonomía del pensamiento filosófico: la epistemología naturalista de Quine en relación con la epistemología tradicional.Graciela De Pierris - 1999 - Análisis Filosófico 19 (1):5-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
9 (#1,254,275)

6 months
1 (#1,471,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Esfeld
University of Lausanne

Citations of this work

What is categorical structuralism?Geoffrey Hellman - 2006 - In Johan van Benthem, Gerhard Heinzman, M. Rebushi & H. Visser (eds.), The Age of Alternative Logics. Springer. pp. 151--161.
Louis Joly as a Platonist Painter?Roger Pouivet - 2006 - In Johan van Benthem, Gerhard Heinzman, M. Rebushi & H. Visser (eds.), The Age of Alternative Logics. Springer. pp. 337--341.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Mind and World.Huw Price & John McDowell - 1994 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):169-181.
Patterns of Discovery.Norwood R. Hanson, A. D. Ritchie & Henryk Mehlberg - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):346-349.
From a Logical Point of View.Richard M. Martin - 1955 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (4):574-575.

View all 47 references / Add more references