Coalescent argumentation

Argumentation 9 (5):837-852 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Coalescent argumentation is a normative ideal that involves the joining together of two disparate claims through recognition and exploration of opposing positions. By uncovering the crucial connection between a claim and the attitudes, beliefs, feelings, values and needs to which it is connected dispute partners are able to identify points of agreement and disagreement. These points can then be utilized to effect coalescence, a joining or merging of divergent positions, by forming the basis for a mutual investigation of non-conflictual options that might otherwise have remained unconsidered. The essay proceeds by defining and discussing ‘argument’, ‘position’ and ‘understanding’. These notions are then brought together to outline the concept of coalescent reasoning



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,412

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation in higher education: examples of actual practices with argumentation tools.Jerry E. B. Andriessen - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education. Springer. pp. 195--214.


Added to PP

95 (#155,478)

6 months
2 (#522,698)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael A. Gilbert
York University

References found in this work

The web of belief.W. V. Quine & J. S. Ullian - 1970 - New York,: Random House. Edited by J. S. Ullian.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The New Rhetoric.Charles Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1957 - Philosophy Today 1 (1):4-10.
The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references