Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation [Book Review]

Argumentation 24 (4):453-474 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I distinguish four current strategies for integrating a rhetorical perspective within normative models for argumentation. Then I propose and argue for a fifth one by defending a conception of acts of arguing as having a rhetorical dimension that provides conditions for characterizing good argumentation, understood as argumentation that justifies a target-claim.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10503-010-9187-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation.Ana Laura Nettel & Georges Roque - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm.Beth Innocenti Manolescu - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):113-125.
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.
Law, logic, rhetoric: A procedural model of legal argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 569--588.
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
The rhetorical view of argumentation: Exploring a paradigm. [REVIEW]Joseph W. Wenzel - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (1):73-88.
The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson.S. J. Balter - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):381-395.
The rhetorical foundation of philosophical argumentation.Michel Meyer - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):255-269.
Aristotle and the tradition of rhetorical argumentation.Eugene Ryan - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (3):291-296.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory: Springer, Argumentation Library, Dordrecht, 2011, volume 20, 209 pp.C. Andone - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):291-296.
Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory.Nancy L. Green - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
The Account of Warrants in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons. [REVIEW]James B. Freeman - 2011 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (3):311-320.
Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-11

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian Bermejo Luque
University of Granada

Citations of this work

Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references