The Puzzle of Perceptual Justification: Conscious experience, Higher-order Beliefs, and Reliable Processes

Switzerland: Springer (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book provides an accessible and up-to-date discussion of contemporary theories of perceptual justification that each highlight different factors related to perception, i.e., conscious experience, higher-order beliefs, and reliable processes. The book’s discussion starts from the viewpoint that perception is not only one of our fundamental sources of knowledge and justification, but also plays this role for many less sophisticated animals. It proposes a scientifically informed reliabilist theory which can accommodate this fact without denying that some of our epistemic abilities as human perceivers are special. This allows it to combine many of our intuitions about the importance of conscious experience and higher-order belief with the controversial thesis that perceptual justification is fundamentally non-evidential in character.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,826

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Dogmatism and the Distinctiveness Problem

In the previous chapter I introduced experientialism as the view that perceptual experience evidentially justifies beliefs. Although this view was motivated by the New Evil Demon Intuition and Blindsight Intuition, it faced a dilemma in how it construed perceptual experience. Either experience is no... see more

Epistemological Disjunctivism and Higher-Order Issues

In this chapter we look at the prospects for the first in a family of views that will be labeled as experientialism. According to these experientialist views, perceptual justification has to do with having sufficient experiential evidence for one’s beliefs. To put it in terms that will be introduced... see more

Process Reliabilism and Its Classic Problems

So far we have looked at versions of experientialism and versions of epistemological disjunctivism that agree in their analysis of perceptual justification as being importantly connected to evidence. Where experientialism takes perceptual beliefs to be evidentially justified by experience, epistemol... see more

Evidentialism and the Problem of Fit

In this chapter we look at the prospects for the first in a family of views that will be labeled as experientialism. According to these experientialist views, perceptual justification has to do with having sufficient experiential evidence for one’s beliefs. To put it in terms that will be introduced... see more

A Higher-Order Rejoinder for Reliabilism

In the last chapter we saw that process reliabilism was confronted with several problems, at the foremost of which were the lack of a good answer to the New Evil Demon Problem and the Clairvoyance Problem. If reliability is indeed necessary and sufficient for the justification of a specific class of... see more

Perception, Hallucination and Justification

In this first chapter, I briefly introduce the three main theories of perceptual justification to be discussed in the following chapters: experientialism, epistemological disjunctivism, and process reliabilism. In Sect. 1.2, I start by considering our ordinary take on perception as one of our fundam... see more

Similar books and articles

Emotion as a Basis of Belief.Monica Holland - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 35 (1):67-71.
Emotion as a Basis of Belief.Monica Holland - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 35 (1):67-71.
¿Qué está mal con el dogmatismo de Pryor?Jorge Ornelas Bernal & G. Cíntora - 2014 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 26 (1):7-31.
On having reasons for perceptual beliefs: A Sellarsian perspective.Dan D. Crawford - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:107-123.
Is coherentism inconsistent?Roche William - 2011 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 33:84-90.
In defense of Epistemic Modesty.Farid Masrour - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):312-331.
The real epistemic problem of cognitive penetration.Harmen Ghijsen - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1457-1475.
On Having Reasons for Perceptual Beliefs: A Sellarsian Perspective.Dan D. Crawford - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:107-123.
Burge on Perceptual Entitlement.Hamid Vahid - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):187-203.
Grounding Perceptual Dogmatism: What are Perceptual Seemings?Harmen Ghijsen - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):196-215.
The Normative Force of Perceptual Justification.Arnaud Dewalque - 2015 - In Maxime Doyon & Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Normativity in Perception. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 178-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
27 (#447,040)

6 months
1 (#479,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harmen Ghijsen
Radboud University Nijmegen

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references