Science by Conceptual Analysis

Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (1):3-24 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The late scholastics, from the fourteenth to the seventeenth centuries, contributed to many fields of knowledge other than philosophy. They developed a method of conceptual analysis that was very productive in those disciplines in which theory is relatively more important than empirical results. That includes mathematics, where the scholastics developed the analysis of continuous motion, which fed into the calculus, and the theory of risk and probability. The method came to the fore especially in the social sciences. In legal theory they developed, for example, the ethical analyses of the conditions of validity of contracts, and natural rights theory. In political theory, they introduced constitutionalism and the thought experiment of a “state of nature”. Their contributions to economics included concepts still regarded as basic, such as demand, capital, labour, and scarcity. Faculty psychology and semiotics are other areas of significance. In such disciplines, later developments rely crucially on scholastic concepts and vocabulary.

Similar books and articles

Concepts, Terms, and Fields of Enquiry.Andrew Halpin - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (2):187-205.
Has psychology debunked conceptual analysis?Per Sandin - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.
Connective conceptual analysis and psychology.Konrad Banicki - 2012 - Theory and Psychology 22 (3):310-323.
Philosophical Conceptual Analysis as an Experimental Method.Michael T. Stuart - 2015 - In Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds.), Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation. Düsseldorf University Press. pp. 267-292.
Moore's paradox of analysis.C. Mason Myers - 1971 - Metaphilosophy 2 (4):295–308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-16

Downloads
430 (#44,256)

6 months
77 (#58,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

William heytesbury.John Longeway - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal.James Franklin - 2001 - Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
The Textbook Tradition in Natural Philosophy 1600–1650.Patricia Reif - 1969 - Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (1):17.
The scholastic background.Roger Ariew & Alan Gabbey - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--425.
Medieval semiotics.Stephan Meier-Oeser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The state of nature and the origin of the state.David E. Luscombe - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 16001--757.

View all 13 references / Add more references