Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press (2001)

Authors
James Franklin
University of New South Wales
Abstract
How were reliable predictions made before Pascal and Fermat's discovery of the mathematics of probability in 1654? What methods in law, science, commerce, philosophy, and logic helped us to get at the truth in cases where certainty was not attainable? The book examines how judges, witch inquisitors, and juries evaluated evidence; how scientists weighed reasons for and against scientific theories; and how merchants counted shipwrecks to determine insurance rates. Also included are the problem of induction before Hume, design arguments for the existence of God, and theories on how to evaluate scientific and historical hypotheses. It is explained how Pascal and Fermat's work on chance arose out of legal thought on aleatory contracts. The book interprets pre-Pascalian unquantified probability in a generally objective Bayesian or logical probabilist sense.
Keywords history of probability  pascal, blaise  law of evidence  aleatory contracts  problem of induction  life annuities  late scholastics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2002
Buy this book $35.00 used   $36.00 new   $40.00 from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0801871093   1421418800   0801865697   9780801871092
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Treatise on Probability.John Maynard Keynes - 1921 - London, England: Dover Publications.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Interpretations of Probability.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Do Vague Probabilities Really Scotch Pascal’s Wager?Craig Duncan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 112 (3):279 - 290.
Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Second Law of Probability Dynamics.Martin Barrett & Elliott Sober - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):941-953.
On the Strong Martin Conjecture.Masanori Itai - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):862-875.
A Refutation of Pure Conjecture.Timothy Cleveland - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):55-81.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
310 ( #31,285 of 2,462,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #15,059 of 2,462,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes