Beyond dematerialization and inscription: Does the materiality of molecular models really matter?

Hyle 6 (1):63 - 84 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking a critical stance towards the notions of dematerialization and inscription, this paper considers the role of physical molecular models in chemical research, specifically in the development of structural concepts and in the articulation of chemists' knowledge of molecular structures. The main argument, illustrated through specific historical case studies, is that the materiality of these models, their specific properties as material objects, is not simply incidental to the role they have played in the development of chemistry

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-11

Downloads
13 (#1,039,776)

6 months
13 (#278,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Playing with molecules.Adam Toon - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):580-589.
Complex Systems, Modelling and Simulation.Sam Schweber & Matthias Wächter - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (4):583-609.
The cognitive life of mechanical molecular models.Mathieu Charbonneau - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4a):585-594.
Molecular models and scientific realism.Gabriela García Zerecero - 2020 - Foundations of Chemistry 22 (3):467-476.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references