The cognitive life of mechanical molecular models
Abstract
The use of physical models of molecular structures as research tools has been central to the development of biochemistry and molecular biology. Intriguingly, it has received little attention from scholars of science. In this paper, I argue that these physical models are not mere three-dimensional representations but that they are in fact very special research tools: they are cognitive augmentations. Despite the fact that they are external props, these models serve as cognitive tools that augment and extend the modeler’s cognitive capacities and performance in molecular modeling tasks. This cognitive enhancement is obtained because of the way the modeler interacts with these models, the models’ materiality contributing to the solving of the molecule’s structure. Furthermore, I argue that these material models and their component parts were designed, built and used specifically to serve as cognitive facilitators and cognitive augmentations.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.06.007
My notes
Similar books and articles
Representations and cognitive explanations: Assessing the dynamicist challenge in cognitive science.William Bechtel - 1998 - Cognitive Science 22 (3):295-317.
Beyond dematerialization and inscription: Does the materiality of molecular models really matter?Eric Francoeur - 2000 - Hyle 6 (1):63 - 84.
Selling a Theory: The Role of Molecular Models in J. H. van 't Hoff's Stereochemistry Theory.Trienke M. van der Spek - 2006 - Annals of Science 63 (2):157-177.
The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science.James L. McClelland - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1):11-38.
Mechanistic and non-mechanistic varieties of dynamical models in cognitive science: explanatory power, understanding, and the ‘mere description’ worry.Raoul Gervais - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):43-66.
Cognitive Modeling at ICCM: State of the Art and Future Directions.Niels A. Taatgen, Marieke K. Vugt, Jelmer P. Borst & Katja Mehlhorn - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):259-263.
Logic in Cognitive Science: Bridging the Gap between Symbolic and Connectionist Paradigms.Alistair Isaac & Jakub Szymanik - 2010 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research (2):279-309.
Playing with molecules.Adam Toon - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):580-589.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-16
Downloads
22 (#522,350)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2014-01-16
Downloads
22 (#522,350)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Optimal grip on affordances in architectural design practices: an ethnography.Erik Rietveld & Anne Ardina Brouwers - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):545-564.
The cognitive integration of scientific instruments: Information, situated cognition, and scientific practice.Richard Heersmink - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):1-21.
Development, Resilience Engineering, Degeneracy, and Cognitive Practices.Alexander James Gillett - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (3):645-664.
Scientific Coordination beyond the A Priori: A Three-dimensional Account of Constitutive Elements in Scientific Practice.Michele Luchetti - 2020 - Dissertation, Central European University
References found in this work
Models in Science.Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2006 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
Representing with physical models.Ronald Giere - 2009 - In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet.David C. Gooding - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):688-698.
Beyond dematerialization and inscription: Does the materiality of molecular models really matter?Eric Francoeur - 2000 - Hyle 6 (1):63 - 84.