Giving answers or raising questions?: the problematic role of institutional ethics committees

Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):137-142 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Institutional ethics committees (IECs) are part of a growing phenomenon in the American health care system. Although a major force driving hospitals to establish IECs is the desire to resolve difficult clinical dilemmas in a quick and systematic way, in this paper we argue that such a goal is naive and, to some extent, misguided. We assess the growing trend of these committees, analyse the theoretical assumptions underlying their establishment, and evaluate their strengths and shortcomings. We show how the 'medical consultation' model is often inappropriately applied to IECs and suggest that IECs must operate under a different framework. Finally, we argue that IECs should be valued for the process they facilitate, and not for the product that they are, often unreasonably, expected to deliver

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of IECs.David A. Buehler, Marc Tunzi & Stuart F. Spicker - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (1):38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
18 (#152,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Hospital Ethics Committees: Is There a Role?Robert M. Veatch - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (3):22-25.
Attitudes to research ethical committees.P. Allen & W. E. Waters - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):61-65.
At the Center.Carol Levine - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (6):ii-ii.

Add more references