Visual phenomenology versus visuomotor imagery: How can we be aware of action properties?

Synthese 198 (4):3309-3338 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here is a crucial question in the contemporary philosophy of perception: how can we be aware of action properties? According to the perceptual view, we consciously see them: they are present in our visual phenomenology. However, this view faces some problems. First, I review these problems. Then, I propose an alternative view, according to which we are aware of action properties because we imagine them through a special form of imagery, which I call visuomotor imagery. My account is to be preferred as it offers an explanation of our awareness of action properties without generating all the problems that the perceptual view faces.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perceptual phenomenology.Bence Nanay - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):235-246.
Perceiving the intrinsic properties of objects: On Noë’s enactive view.Ignacio Ávila - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (1):55-71.
Four theories of amodal perception.Bence Nanay - 2007 - Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Do we hear meanings? – between perception and cognition.Anna Drożdżowicz - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (2):196-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-09

Downloads
64 (#247,010)

6 months
40 (#111,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriele Ferretti
Università Di Bergamo

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The representational character of experience.David J. Chalmers - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The future for philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 153--181.

View all 70 references / Add more references