Four theories of amodal perception
Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (
2007)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
We are aware of those parts of a cat that are occluded behind
a fence. The question is how we represent these occluded
parts of perceived objects: this is the problem of amodal
perception. I will consider four theories and compare their
explanatory power: (i) we see them, (ii) we have nonperceptual beliefs about them, (iii) we have immediate
perceptual access to them and (iv) we visualize them. I point
out that the first three of these views face both empirical and
conceptual objections. I argue for the fourth account,
according to which we visualize the occluded parts of
perceived objects. Finally, I consider some important
consequences of this view with regards to the content and the
evolution of visualization.