Kant’s First Argument in the Metaphysical Expositions

Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 2 (1):219-227 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Kant's first argument in the metaphysical expositions defends a foundational insight on which much of the rest of his thought depends: that our experience of the spatial properties and relations of things is not based on comparison of the things (matters) found in space or on any form of reasoning (causal or demonstrative). Spatial and temporal relations are originally given in sensory intuition, not constructed or inferred.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's Metaphysical Deduction.Darrell Johnson - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:269-275.
Kant and the Ontological Argument.Graeme Hunter - 1989 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 2 (2):3-10.
Kant's Argument against the Possibility of Cognitive Science.Richard McDonough - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:37-45.
Kant and the Private Language Argument.Jill Vance Buroker - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1:455-464.
Comments on Richard McDonough's, “Kant's Argument Against the Possibility of Cognitive Science".Frank Kirkland - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1:1361-1365.
Is a Transcendental Deduction Necessary for the Metaphysical Foundations?Eric Watkins - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:381-387.
Reinhold and the Short Argument to Idealism.Karl Ameriks - 1989 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 2 (2):441-453.
Considerations Concerning the "Transcendental Deductions" Structure of Argument.Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz - 1989 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 2 (1):351-365.
Is Moore a Metaphysical Ethicist?Sibel Oktar - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:317-323.
Kant und das Cartesische Cogito.Nicholas Rescher - 1991 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 1:89-103.
Kant's Highest Good.C. A. Brincat - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:849-856.
Kant and Hegel on the Logic of Being-for-Self.David S. Stern - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1:973-976.
Kant's Ambivalent Analogies.Paul Guyer - 1989 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress 2 (1):33-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
25 (#627,632)

6 months
3 (#968,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references