Kant’s Account of Sensation

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):63-88 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant defined ‘sensation’as ‘the effect of an object on the representative capacity, so far as we are affected by it.’ This is, to put it mildly, not one among his more elegant, clear or helpful sayings. And it is merely an instance of a more general malaise. Kant did not say as much about sensation as he should have, and his account-or lack of it-can be seen at the root of many of the difficulties that have plagued his readers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Euclidean Tradition and Kant’s Thoughts on Geometry.Howard Duncan - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):23-48.
Descartes’s Ontology of Sensation.Kurt Smith - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):563-584.
Kant: an introduction.C. D. Broad - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant on the Phenomenology of Touch and Vision.Gary Hatfield - 2014 - In Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant's Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
37 (#419,211)

6 months
15 (#234,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

References found in this work

Kant's Analytic.Jonathan Bennett - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):295-298.
Kant's Theory of Knowledge.Walter T. Marvin - 1909 - Philosophical Review 18 (6):653.
Kant's Transcendental Idealism. [REVIEW]Arthur Melnick - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):134-136.
Relativity and the spatiality of mental events.Robert Weingard - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (4):279 - 284.

View all 8 references / Add more references