124 found
Order:
  1.  65
    Resolving epistemic dilemmas.Douglas Odegard - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):161 – 168.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  14
    Models And Metaphors.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (150):349-356.
    Like his earlier Language and Philosophy. and Problems of Analysis, Models and Metaphors is a collection of Black's papers unified by the belief that linguistic considerations can play an important part in framing and solving philosophical problems. Broadly speaking, the linguistic approach takes two forms: examining the uses of a word, or of a set of related words, frequently occurring in philosophical inquiries, either for the general purposes of clarification or as a useful aid to the solution, or dissolution, of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3.  75
    Deductive Justification.Catherine M. Canary & Douglas Odegard - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (2):305-.
    The principle that epistemic justification is necessarily transmitted to all the known logical consequences of a justified belief continues to attract critical attention. That attention is not misplaced. If the Transmission Principle is valid, anyone who thinks that a given belief is justified must defend the view that every known consequence of the belief is also justification of the conclusion in an obviously valid argument. Once created, the gap is hard to fill, whatever the circumstances. Reflection principle is modified, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  79
    Miracles and Good Evidence.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (1):37-46.
    EVEN IF ’MIRACLE’ MEANS A VIOLATION OF A LAW OF NATURE, A CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THINKING THAT MIRACLES ARE POSSIBLE, DETECTABLE, AND COMPATIBLE WITH SCIENCE. THE CASE WORKS BY DEFINING A LAW-VIOLATION AS AN EVENT OF A KIND THAT IS EPISTEMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS THERE IS GOOD EVIDENCE OF A GOD’S PRODUCING AN INSTANCE. HUMAN AND NON-HUMAN OBJECTIONS ARE CONSIDERED AND ANSWERED.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5. On "a priori" contingency.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Analysis 36 (4):201.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  58
    Locke and Mind-Body Dualism.Douglas Odegard - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):87 - 105.
    The word ‘dualism’ can be used to pick out at least four different theories concerning the relationship between mind and body. A mind and a body are two different entities and each is “had” by a man. A man is thus a composite being with two components, one “inner”, the other “outer”. You, for example, are a man and your mind is “inner” in the sense that you alone can reflectively experience yourself thinking, or feeling pain, or seeing colours . (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  56
    Locke and the Unreality of Relations.Douglas Odegard - 1969 - Theoria 35 (2):147-152.
  8.  83
    On A Priori Contingency.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Analysis 36 (4):201 - 203.
  9.  38
    Volition and Action.Douglas Odegard - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):141 - 151.
  10.  4
    Knowledge and scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11.  81
    The Body Identical With the Human Mind.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - The Monist 55 (4):579-601.
    The question ‘For Spinoza, what body is identical with the human mind?’ deserves more attention than it has received. On first view it looks plausible enough simply to answer ‘the human body’, using the latter expression in its ordinary sense. Yet a second look, prompted by the question What then are we to make of the human brain?’, can easily create dissatisfaction and send us searching for firmer guidelines in Spinoza’s philosophy. I want to unearth such guidelines here. My investigation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12.  38
    Identity through Time.Douglas Odegard - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1):29 - 38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13. Knowledge and Scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Philosophy 59 (227):133-135.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  47
    Absurdity and types.Douglas Odegard - 1966 - Mind 75 (297):97-113.
  15.  36
    Arthur Pap and the Paradox of Analysis.Douglas Odegard - 1967 - Theoria 33 (3):230-245.
  16.  56
    Conclusive reasons and knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Mind 85 (338):239-241.
  17.  46
    Excluding the Middle from Loose Concepts.Douglas Odegard - 1965 - Theoria 31 (2):138-144.
  18.  37
    Indiscernibles.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):204-213.
  19.  13
    Locke and the Specious Present.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (sup1):141-151.
    I intend to defend three claims in this paper: Locke's position does imply a specious present theory, one which importantly resembles a version adopted by C. D. Broad. Contrary to what some commentators think or imply, Locke does not make the ideas which occupy the specious present durationless and he does not confine the specious present to the duration of what we experience in reflection. The theory he implies does create a serious problem for him, however, and in order to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20.  30
    On two arguments against moral certainty.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Mind 90 (357):79-90.
    Some moral philosophers, Such as ross and moore, Think that, Whereas we can be sure of limited judgments concerning "prima facie" duties and intrinsic values, We cannot be sure of judgments of rightness or wrongness. Two arguments for this type of scepticism are examined. The first works only if we assume, With ross, That '"prima facie" duty' is a moral notion, Not an epistemic notion. The second works only if we assume that there is no difference between uncertainty about a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  57
    Personal and bodily identity.Douglas Odegard - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (January):69-71.
  22. Phenomenal time.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Ratio (Misc.) 20 (December):116-122.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  12
    Warrant and Responsibility.Douglas Odegard - 1992 - American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3):253 - 265.
  24.  17
    Locke as an Empiricist.Douglas Odegard - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (153):185 - 196.
    John Loke is often referred to as the first of a triumvirate of major British Empiricists, and sometimes even as the father of British Empiricism. In many cases the reference is extremely guarded, and at times the word ‘empiricist’ is being used merely as a convenient label for organising university courses, amounting to little more than a synonym for ‘Locke, Berkeley, and Hume, and to some extent Bacon, Hobbes, Reid, and Mill’. Given that ‘empiricist’ is being used in a philosophically (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  25
    Two Types of Scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (210):459 - 472.
    Suppose that a jury in a murder trial brings in a verdict of guilty and one of the jurors still wonders whether the verdict is a good one, although he is not inclined to try to have it reversed. Is his attitude coherent?
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  55
    Alston and Self-Warrant.Douglas Odegard - 1979 - Analysis 39 (1):42 - 44.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  15
    Analytical Approaches to Determinism.Douglas Odegard - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (2):271-280.
  28.  35
    A Knower's Evidence.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (2):123 - 128.
  29. Alan Miller, Reasons and Experience Reviewed by.Douglas Odegard - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (6):403-405.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  83
    Anscombe, sensation and intentional objects.Douglas Odegard - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (1):69-77.
    Let us use ‘sensation’ such that we can talk about ‘visual sensation’ and ‘auditory sensation’, and such that ‘sensation’ cannot readily be pluralized. It then makes sense to talk about the “objects” involved in sensation. For example, if someone sees red, where his seeing red is a case of sensation, then there is an “object” involved in the situation in the sense that we can talk about “what” he sees. One of the enduring problems in philosophy is to try to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  66
    Ayer versus Non-Starters.Douglas Odegard - 1966 - Analysis 26 (5):172 - 176.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Ayer versus non-starters.Douglas Odegard - 1966 - Analysis 26 (5):172.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  32
    Berkeley and the Perception of Ideas.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):155 - 171.
    It is important to try to understand Berkeley's exact position on what it is for someone to perceive an idea. He is frequently presented as holding that to perceive an idea is to be confronted by an object which is in some sense mind-dependent and private, and, if taken in a certain way, such a remark is not inaccurate. But the interpretation which renders it accurate needs to be specified and this is a task which awaits completion. Until it is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  84
    Berkeleian Idealism and the Dream Argument.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Idealistic Studies 11 (2):93-99.
    1. Introduction. Can Berkeleian idealism draw any support from the following argument?
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  55
    Can a Justified Belief Be False?Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):561 - 568.
    Robert richman tries to defend a justified-True-Belief analysis of knowledge by attacking the assumption that a justified belief can be false. But, Although 'p is justified but false' is incoherent if asserted about the way things actually are, It is not incoherent if asserted about a supposed situation. And critics of a justified-True-Belief analysis need only do the latter.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  32
    Charity and moral imperatives.Douglas Odegard - 1989 - Theoria 55 (2):81-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  26
    Chisholm's approach to scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Metaphilosophy 12 (1):7–12.
  38.  2
    Chisholm's Approach to Scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Metaphilosophy 12 (1):7-12.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  42
    Complete justification and truth value.Douglas Odegard - 1987 - Philosophia 17 (3):311-318.
    Almeder effectively defends his view that justification entails truth against some earlier objections and offers new arguments for the entailment. Although the arguments make clear that truth claims depend on justification claims, They still fail to establish an entailment.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  11
    Conjunctivity, knowledge, and probability.Douglas Odegard - 1977 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):206 – 208.
  41.  4
    Critical notice.Douglas Odegard - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):545-557.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Classifying The Class-Membership Relation.Douglas Odegard - 1969 - Logique Et Analyse 12 (September):221-224.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  64
    Descartes and the Dream Argument.Douglas Odegard - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (2):155 - 164.
  44.  69
    Disembodied existence and central state materialism.Douglas Odegard - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):256-60.
  45.  41
    Deep moral dilemmas.Douglas Odegard - 1987 - Theoria 53 (2-3):73-86.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  61
    Error and doubt.Douglas Odegard - 1993 - Philosophia 22 (3-4):341-359.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  27
    Essences and Discovery: Plato, Locke, and Leibniz.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Dialogue 3 (3):219-234.
    According to Plato's Republic, human knowledge in highest form owes its existence to a priori discoveries made during the course of dialectical investigations. Being a priori, such discoveries are neither empirical observations nor conclusions based upon empirical observations, although in some cases they may be “occasioned” by experience. They are matter for intellectual, not literal, vision, and making them is what distinguishes the successful philosopher from the non-philosopher. Thus, in the Phaedo, Plato is in a position to argue that the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  4
    Empirical knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Philosophical Books 23 (4):193-198.
  49.  81
    Escaping the Cartesian Circle.Douglas Odegard - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (2):167 - 173.
    Descartes' attempt to avoid the charge of circularity is unconvincing, And more recent efforts by scholars such as frankfurt and kenny to defend him on this point have not been entirely successful. The only way to remove the circle is to replace the search for perfect knowledge by a search for knowledge that is less than perfect, Yet not obviously attainable. Philosophers can then defend knowledge claims against metaphysical doubts without fear of having to beg the question, Indeed can even (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  25
    Foundations for Claiming Knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):613 - 633.
    One reasonably familiar argument for epistemological scepticism maintains that knowledge requires foundations and that we rarely, if ever, have such foundations. The conclusion of this argument is that we rarely, if ever, have knowledge. A second, less ambitious sceptical argument is that philosophers cannot justifiably say that they have knowledge unless their statement is based on foundations and that we never have such foundations. The conclusion of this argument is not that we never have knowledge, but that philosophers are never (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 124