Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity

Scientific Reports 8 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We provide a new account of the oft-mentioned special character of touch, showing that its superior reliability is subjective rather than objective : Touch provides higher certainty than vision, for the same level of objective accuracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Touch Without Touching.Matthew Fulkerson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Painting, sculpture, sight, and touch.Robert Hopkins - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.
Touch in the Abstract.Aden Evens - 2011 - Substance 40 (3):67-78.
Kant on the Phenomenology of Touch and Vision.Gary Hatfield - 2014 - In Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant's Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–56.
Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.D. G. Collingridge - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (203):102-105.
Touch, Representation, and Blindness.Morton A. Heller (ed.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-04

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ophelia Deroy
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references