Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3869-3893 (2021)

Authors
Joshua Shepherd
Carleton University
Myrto Mylopoulos
Carleton University
Abstract
One necessary condition on any adequate account of perception is clarity regarding whether unconscious perception exists. The issue is complicated, and the debate is growing in both philosophy and science. In this paper we consider the case for unconscious perception, offering three primary achievements. First, we offer a discussion of the underspecified notion of central coordinating agency, a notion that is critical for arguments that purportedly perceptual states are not attributable to the individual, and thus not genuinely perceptual. We develop an explication of what it is for a representational state to be available to central coordinating agency for guidance of behavior. Second, drawing on this explication, we place a more careful understanding of the attributability of a state to the individual in the context of a range of empirical work on vision-for-action, saccades, and skilled typing. The results place pressure on the skeptic about unconscious perception. Third, reflecting upon broader philosophical themes running through debates about unconscious perception, we highlight how our discussion places pressure on the view that perception is a manifest kind, rather than a natural kind. In doing so, we resist the tempting complaint that the debate about unconscious perception is merely verbal.
Keywords perception  dorsal stream  unconscious perception  agency  control  metacognition
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-021-01629-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Reference and Consciousness.J. Campbell - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Epistemic Role of Consciousness.Declan Smithies - 2019 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

View all 66 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Modularity of the Motor System.Myrto Mylopoulos - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (3):376-393.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Scepticism about Unconscious Perception.J. Berger & M. Mylopoulos - 2019 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 26 (11-12):8-32.
Unconscious Perception Reconsidered.Ian Phillips - 2018 - Analytic Philosophy 59 (4):471-514.
Unconscious Perception and Perceptual Knowledge.Paweł J. Zięba - 2017 - In Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau & Friedrich Stadler (eds.), The Philosophy of Perception and Observation. Contributions of the 40th International Wittgenstein Symposium August 6-12, 2017 Kirchberg am Wechsel. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 301-303.
Unconscious Perception: The Need for a Paradigm Shift.Daniel Holender & Katia Duscherer - 2004 - Perception and Psychophysics 66 (5):872-881.
Are There Unconscious Perceptual Processes?Berit Brogaard - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):449-63.
Unconscious Perception, Part II.Godfrey N. A. Vesey - 1960 - Aristotelian Society 67:67-78.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-07

Total views
198 ( #57,909 of 2,499,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #10,570 of 2,499,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes