Touch Without Touching

Philosophers' Imprint 12 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that in touch, as in vision and audition, we can and often do perceive objects and properties even when we are not in direct or even apparent bodily contact with them. Unlike those senses, however, touch experiences require a special kind of mutually interactive connection between our sensory surfaces and the objects of our experience. I call this constraint the Connection Principle. This view has implications for the proper understanding of touch, and perceptual reference generally. In particular, spelling out the implications of this principle yields a rich and compelling picture of the spatial character of touch

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Keep in touch.Cody Gilmore - 2012 - Philosophia Naturalis 49 (1):85-111.
The unity of haptic touch.Matthew Fulkerson - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):493 - 516.
Touch and situatedness.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):299 – 322.
Touching pictures.Robert Hopkins - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
Touch and the Experience of the Genuine.C. Korsmeyer - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4):365-377.
Empathy and sympathy as tactile encounter.Edith Wyschogrod - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):25-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-27

Downloads
154 (#119,978)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Fulkerson
University of California, San Diego

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references