- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
One size does not fit all
American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):40 – 42 (2006)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
Perception of size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
One Size Does Not Fit All: Toward “Upstream Ethics”?Vural Ozdemir & Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):42-44.
Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
One Size Does Not Fit All: The Ethical Imperative to Limit the Concept of Research Exceptionalism.Melissa McCullough - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):60-61.
When the coefficient hits the clinic: Effect size and the size of the effect.Brendan Maher - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):211-211.
To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
Does one size fit all? Hurley on shared circuits.Alvin I. Goldman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):27-28.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#548,167)
6 months
9 (#301,354)
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#548,167)
6 months
9 (#301,354)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations.Susan M. Wolf, Frances P. Lawrenz, Charles A. Nelson, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Mildred K. Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G. Fletcher, Michael K. Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A. Keane, Barbara A. Koenig, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Elizabeth G. McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S. Parker, Sharon F. Terry, Brian Van Ness & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):219-248.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
References found in this work
Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo