Neurological models of size scaling

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lehar argues that a simple Neuron Doctrine cannot explain perceptual phenomena such as size constancy but he fails to discuss existing, more complex neurological models. Size models that rely purely on scaling for distance are sparse, but several models are also concerned with other aspects of size perception such as geometrical illusions, relative size, adaptation, perceptual learning, and size discrimination.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, helmholtz, the moon illusion, and two visual systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Perception of size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
ZF + "every set is the same size as a wellfounded set".Thomas Forster - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#408,165)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references