To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I discuss Fitch & Denenberg's argument that no correction for brain size is needed when assessing callosal size. Morphometric criteria may not be sufficient to determine whether corrections are needed. Functional studies of callosal transfer will ultimately specify whether corrections for size are necessary in each case.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adaptive normalization for IPW estimation.Johan Ugander & Samir Khan - 2023 - Journal of Causal Inference 11 (1).
Criticizing Consent: A Reply to Susan Brison.Sarah Clark Miller - 2021 - Social Philosophy Today 37:23-31.
What determines evolutionary brain growth?Francisco Aboitiz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):278-279.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#907,727)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references