Apperzeption bei Leibniz und Kant

In Giuseppe Motta, Dennis Schulting & Udo Thiel (eds.), Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Theory of Apperception: New Interpretations. De Gruyter. pp. 59-92 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Metaphysics and Apperzeption.Rolf Ahlers - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (3):151-173.
Kant, the Leibnizians, and Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2011 - In Brandon Look (ed.), Continuum Companion to Leibniz. New York: Continuum. pp. 289-309.
Kant und Carl über Apperzeption.Rolf-Peter Horstmann - 2007 - In Jürgen Stolzenberg (ed.), Kant in der Gegenwart. De Gruyter. pp. 131-148.
Kant’s Retrieval of Leibniz.Harold W. Brogan - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):271-284.
Von Menschen und Tieren – Leibniz über Apperzeption, Reflexion und conscientia.Sebastian Bender - 2013 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 67 (2):214-241.
Leibniz on Innate Ideas and Kant on the Origin of the Categories.Alberto Vanzo - 2018 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100 (1):19-45.


Added to PP

8 (#1,256,193)

6 months
4 (#724,033)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references