Enriching, Rather than Revising, the Conceptual Toolbox on Germline Interventions

American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):25-27 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 25-27.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2020.1781968

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Legal Framework of New Zealand Concerning Germline Interventions.Angela Sargent - 2019 - In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 175-205.
Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?Robert Ranisch - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):60-69.
Future Generations and the Justifiability of Germline Engineering.Ioana Petre - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (3):328-341.
Opinion on the Legal Framework Concerning Interventions in Human Germline Genes in Belgium.Herman Nys - 2019 - In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 39-61.
Revising, Correcting and Transferring Genes: Germline Editing Versus Natural Reproduction.Jesse Gray - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):44-46.
Prospects of Human Germline Modification by CRISPR-Cas9 – an Ethicist’s View.Dieter Birnbacher - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 53-66.
Non-Human Germline Interventions.Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):23-25.
Host as a Unique Ethical Dimension of Germline Interventions.Connor T. A. Brenna - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):51-53.
Assessing the Ethical Distinctions Between Different Types of Prospective Human Germline Genetic Interventions.Audrey R. Chapman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):49-50.
Three Christian Arguments Against Germline Engineering.R. DiSilvestro - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (2):201-218.
Microbiome‐Germline Interactions and Their Transgenerational Implications.Michael Elgart & Yoav Soen - 2018 - Bioessays 40 (4):1700018.
Notes on a Genre to Come: Screenwriting and the 'Thesis-film'.Steven Maras - 2004 - Cultural Studies Review 10 (2):85-98.
Germline edits: Trust ethics review process.Julian Savulescu, Chris Gyngell & Thomas Douglas - 2015 - Nature 520.
Arguments for and against Germline Intervention: A Critical Review of Ronald Green’s Babies by Design.Marvin J. H. Lee & Sophia Lozowski - 2017 - Journal of Healthcare Ethics and Administration 3 (1).
"Playing God" and germline intervention.Ted Peters - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):365-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-07

Downloads
10 (#1,193,888)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexandre Erler
National Yang Ming University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?Eric T. Juengst - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (3):15-23.
Correction.[author unknown] - 2018 - Angelaki 23 (6):1-1.
Correction.[author unknown] - 2020 - History of European Ideas 46 (2):225-225.

View all 10 references / Add more references