What is the Link between Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mind, the Iterative Conception of Set, Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and God? About the Pleasure and the Difficulties of Interpreting Kurt Gödel’s Philosophical Remarks

In Gabriella Crocco & Eva-Maria Engelen (eds.), Kurt Gödel: Philosopher-Scientist. Presses Universitaires de Provence (forthcoming)

Eva-Maria Engelen
Universität Konstanz
It is shown in this article in how far one has to have a clear picture of Gödel’s philosophy and scientific thinking at hand (and also the philosophical positions of other philosophers in the history of Western Philosophy) in order to interpret one single Philosophical Remark by Gödel. As a single remark by Gödel (very often) mirrors his whole philosophical thinking, Gödel’s Philosophical Remarks can be seen as a philosophical monadology. This is so for two reasons mainly: Firstly, because it pictures a monadology already via its form. And secondly, because Gödel wanted to establish in his Philosophical Remarks a modern monadology in adapting the philosophical principles of Leibniz’s monadology to modern science. This article will only deal with the first aspect that has been mentioned namely that a single remark by Gödel (very often) mirrors his whole philosophy (at the time) for example: set theory, perception and intuition of mathematical objects and axioms, the nature of the human mind, the concept and existence of God, and so on. This renders it extremely difficult to interpret Gödel’s philosophical remarks but interpreting it provides also a deep insight in Gödel’s philosophical thoughts.
Keywords Kurt Gödel  Philosophy of Mind  Iterative Concept of Set  God  Intuition
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,731
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kurt Gödel: Philosopher-Scientist.Gabriella Crocco & Eva-Maria Engelen (eds.) - 2016 - Marseille: Presses universitaires de Provence.
On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Gödel and the Intuition of Concepts.Richard Tieszen - 2002 - Synthese 133 (3):363 - 391.
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems and Computer Science.Roman Murawski - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.
Kurt Godel and Phenomenology.Richard Tieszen - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (2):176-194.
Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth.Matthias Baaz (ed.) - 2011 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
On Some Much Maligned Remarks of Wittgenstein on Gödel.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (3):262–270.
Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and Physics.Newton C. A. Da Costa - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (3):453-459.
The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,335,539 of 2,462,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes